🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the UK, and it seems it’s time for a re-evaluation. As time has passed, an observance that began as a celebration and reminder of history, culture and the connections between global Black communities, has developed a corporate feel, growing to encompass gatherings where African descendants are remunerated to talk to Caucasian groups about hidden biases and active solidarity. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s generated a rise in the business of showcasing anti-racist commitment. However, that period has concluded. The surge has peaked, producing a diluted aftermath of what raising awareness is for.

The Origins of Black History Observance

Initially celebrated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with seven days of remembrance and recognition in the February's second week. Black History Month grew out of this movement and was publicly established in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the United States and Canada in winter, but also in October in the Britain, Deutschland, Ireland and the Netherlands.

The month has developed since those days, giving reduced attention to the histories of the slave trade across the Atlantic and struggles for equality, and increasingly on notable African descendants in politics, culture, and activism, and extensively acknowledging the contribution Black people have made to shape the country. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with lectures and artistic activities. But the way the month is celebrated is a indication of the current political situation. How it evolves is a good lesson in how co-option leads to erosion: the reshaping of Black History Month has stymied the purpose of it, which is to address structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Troubling Time

Little demonstrates how important it is to reconsider Black History Month more than the particular moment in which it falls this year. In the United Kingdom, a reemerging right-wing in the guise of the Reform organization is top in opinion ratings. In the summer we witnessed the largest far-right rally in the history of Britain. Kemi Badenoch, the African descendant in charge of the right-wing political group, is a firm opponent of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a position where a member of parliament gains confidence to declare that the absence of Caucasian individuals in parts of a city is a source of worry. Simultaneously, ultra-nationalist movements are expanding in the EU as a whole.

In the America, a significant offensive against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been brought, frequently with success, to the top legal institutions of the country. A drive to scrub Black history and experience from the archives is in progress. One of the political figure's initial presidential directives focused on the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the renowned cultural organization, alleging that they of a “concerted and widespread effort to alter the country's historical narrative” by depicting the United States “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

Given these circumstances, the observance represents how insufficiently it can be effective if it is limited to either obligatory business commemorations, or depoliticized festivities of former accomplishments, rather than addressing the situation of the contemporary world. It also shows how its restricted time span means that it is disconnected from the broader ongoing work that is needed. An academic expert, a educator at University of Greenwich, put it best when she raised concerns about the fleeting superficial actions of the observance. “The problem with adopting a symbolic stance”, she stated, “is that it often means that Black History Month evolves into a transient display rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Determining how to alter, change and broaden initiatives for equal rights and acknowledgment in such moments of dejection and worry is a treacherous thing. There is a urge to just discontinue things like Black History Month altogether, thinking they are no longer suitable, or are remnants of an era that has failed to deliver.

Yet, in spite of all this, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and legacy of racial movements – local anti-racism groups, inclusion and equity efforts, and yes, even those talks to businesses – constitute an infrastructure that a considerable labor has been invested in. It is there not only to deteriorate as the politics moves on (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month appear as? To begin with, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is dispersed through the year (as certain organizations are already beginning to do), parts of its content (particularly around historic Black characters) integrated into school curriculums. It would also be a era that does not evade politics, and allows opportunity for individuals, particularly youth, to air their fears and experiences. What value has basic knowledge of the past when it doesn’t reckon with the contemporary truth of far-right rallies in the urban areas? Organizations who mark it should not be reassured with the neutral terminology of implicit prejudice and awareness of minor insults, but faced with the dangers that impact society if opposition to discrimination is not taken seriously. To summarize, Black History Month should be made contemporary, urgent, and responsive. It could be that an entire name rebrand is required – Black History is Now Month.